Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:06:50 +0100
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libthr/thread thr_mutex.c src/lib/libkse/thread thr_mutex.c src/include pthread.h
Message-ID:  <4726597A.6000004@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710291756360.19572@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <200710292101.l9TL1mAE049561@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710291712100.19572@sea.ntplx.net> <472650BF.5060706@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710291732090.19572@sea.ntplx.net> <4726560F.5050804@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710291756360.19572@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
>> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The libkse implementation already spins for a bit.  The default
>>>>> number of spins is 500.
>>>>
>>>> OK, cool.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure that another mutex type is warranted, the default
>>>>> mutex implementation should be adaptive I think.
>>>>
>>>> The point being that certain existing applications already know 
>>>> about this mutex name and will use it automatically when it exists.
>>>>
>>>> I am a bit wary of making this the default type though.  The 
>>>> algorithm is a pessimization when the conditions described above are 
>>>> not true.
>>>
>>> I agree, and it applies a little to the KSE approach also.
>>> Spinning is mostly a hack for not being able to tell in
>>> userland if a thread is swapped in/out or is on another
>>> CPU.  If you solve that problem, then you can make the
>>> default mutex adaptive.
>>
>> Yeah.  It looks like Solaris does this.  In principle you could do it 
>> cheaply with a shared page, I'm not sure what Solaris does.
> 
> I think we should add back the thread mailbox for libthr threads.
> I was in favor of keeping the mailbox for libthr, and this might
> be a good use for it.

I am not familiar with that code, can you point me to the change that 
removed it?

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4726597A.6000004>