Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:42:38 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r411343 - in head/graphics/giflib: . files Message-ID: <455A9D57-3652-497E-82FD-394D8EDC65E0@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <9F2CD0551421554820FBD322@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201603181146.u2IBkM6w015336@repo.freebsd.org> <9F2CD0551421554820FBD322@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 16:27, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > +--On 18 mars 2016 11:46:22 +0000 Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > | Author: feld > | Date: Fri Mar 18 11:46:22 2016 > | New Revision: 411343 > | URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411343 > |=20 > | Log: > | graphics/giflib: Update to 5.1.3 > | =20 > | - Update MAINTAINER > | - Remove patch which is now included upstream >=20 > I don't remember seeing an exp-run done for this update, also, it was not > approved by the maintainer. >=20 (...continuing) I was involved in the update from 5.1.1 to 5.1.2 due to the C= VE and the fix and PORTREVISION bump to a rendering bug in 5.1.2. I had not r= eceived any feedback about this update. One of the reporters notified me of 5= .1.3 including the patch now accepted by upstream, so I updated the port. I w= as still under the impression the MAINTAINER situation was a simple mistake a= nd wasn't aware of the exp-run policy for these specific ports. I'm now well aware and have a pointy hat firmly seated on my head today.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?455A9D57-3652-497E-82FD-394D8EDC65E0>