From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 28 0:21: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F6C159FC for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:21:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA80444; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:20:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200001280820.AAA80444@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Warner's PCI Modem Driver In-Reply-To: <200001280410.VAA51925@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Jan 27, 2000 09:10:29 pm" To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:20:32 -0800 (PST) Cc: nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de (Juergen Lock), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message <200001280357.UAA51783@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes: > : class machine running at a 33MHz bus). The old ISA modems were US > : Robotics Sportsters > > US Robotic Sporster 28.8 upgraded to 33.6. Using 2 or 3 year old DSP technolgy vs a current DSP technology modem. That explains the delta in your line error rate, the newer DSP's have a lot more horse power and the FIR filters are an order of magnitude better since they have all this horsepower to use from a $5.00 chip. I suspect that a modern ISA modem would have solved your problem as well... or at least made your comparison orange to orange :-) -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message