From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 15:30:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC116A4BF for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (65-37-69-87.bras01.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [65.37.69.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCA843FDD for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from tagalong (unknown [165.107.42.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A103BF3A8 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <016d01c36e7d$21888bb0$6e2a6ba5@lc.ca.gov> From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: "FreeBSD Questions" References: <1062086767.35417.6.camel@farmer.lc.ca.gov> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:30:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Ports Installed Are Newer Than Tree? -- SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 22:30:29 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:35 AM Subject: Ports Installed Are Newer Than Tree? > It seems that the ports I have installed on my system are newer than the > ones in the ports tree. If I run portversion, I get output that looks > like this: > > farmer# portversion -v -L= > XFree86-Server-4.3.0_6 > succeeds port (port has 4.3.0_5) > cdrtools-2.0_1 > succeeds port (port has 2.0) > gconf-1.0.9_3 > succeeds port (port has 1.0.9_2) > gdm2-2.4.1.4 > succeeds port (port has 2.4.1.3_1) > gnomegames2-2.2.1_1 > succeeds port (port has 2.2.1) > > And the list goes on. I've updated my ports tree using cvsup and it > finishes successfully. I've also run portsdb -uU to update the indexes > however the problem persists. > > I'm stumped and don't know what else to check. Any ideas? I'm running > 4.8. Thanks for the responses. I found that my INDEX was bad. I tried deleting the file and then running make index but that kept failing. Finally I deleted my entire ports tree and the directory cvsup used to keep track of updates. Then I ran cvsup. Finally I ran portsdb -uU to make the new index files. Everything looks good now. I'm sure my approach was drastic and would appreciate knowing how I could have fixed this instead of blowing everything away and starting over. Thanks, Drew