From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 01:28:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0D216A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:28:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE443D54; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:27:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely5.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i5R1R1aI080190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:27:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely5.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5R1QEUi093000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:26:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely5.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5R1QEnV092999; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:26:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:26:13 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Lukas Ertl Message-ID: <20040627012612.GA92906@cicely5.cicely.de> References: <200406260905.55143.msch@snafu.de> <20040626135545.B666@korben.in.tern> <200406262004.24170.msch@snafu.de> <20040626200628.Q666@korben.in.tern> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040626200628.Q666@korben.in.tern> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely5.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT i386 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: Matthias Schuendehuette cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic with vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:28:00 -0000 On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 08:06:42PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > >On Saturday 26 June 2004 13:56, Lukas Ertl wrote: > >>I'm quite sure that recent changes to vfs_mount.c cause this. I'm > >>not sure how to fix it, though. > > > >At least going back to version 1.128 of vfs_mount.c alone doesn't help. > > You probably need to go back to 1.127. I saw the same thing with 22th -current on alpha. As workaround the vinum volumes are started later for now, but with around 1 day uptime: fatal kernel trap: trap entry = 0x2 (memory management fault) cpuid = 0 faulting va = 0x0 type = access violation cause = store instruction pc = 0xfffffc00005e5cb8 ra = 0xfffffe0000377238 sp = 0xfffffe003079da90 curthread = 0xfffffc007aa1e000 pid = 32, comm = syncer Stopped at bcopy_samealign_lp: stq_u t2,0(a1) <0x0> db> trace bcopy_samealign_lp() at bcopy_samealign_lp vinumstart() at vinumstart+0x138 vinumstrategy() at vinumstrategy+0x118 prologue botch: displacement 16 -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de