Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:24:05 +0400
From:      Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: git tools for building in base?
Message-ID:  <CALH631nJ_cnfLhG%2BSDX5Mchk2%2BRrfFn=38rXYrFwVxV%2BtG_QkQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfq0XOuJ--2jXVY42Nkxpu4YnuoCpoy4vVDo9o4hUp6ATw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <X714z7pMgNOFaTIc@rpi4.local> <20201125055425.01AA628417@elsa.codelab.cz> <10f7b800-b015-2a80-b741-4f7db03bf6eb@quip.cz> <e3dce606-1a28-886f-b481-7f1d224d82cc@madpilot.net> <CANCZdfq0XOuJ--2jXVY42Nkxpu4YnuoCpoy4vVDo9o4hUp6ATw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:50 PM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 7:27 AM Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> wrote:
>
> > On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> > > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > >
> > >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from
> > >> cvs to hg (Mercurial).
> > >
> > > Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git
> > > and why NetBSD chose Mercurial? I am using both tools at $WORK, I am
> > > just curious what leads to these decisions.
> > >
> >
> > This is a draft document discussing exactly this (I'm not the author,
> > imp was)
> >
> > https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md
>
>
> My blog
> http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/09/freebsd-subversion-to-git-migration.html
>
> And this video I did
> https://youtu.be/uj1Ricrq0bs that starts with an old in joke...
>
> Warner
>

I can't find anything about Mercurial in all three links.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631nJ_cnfLhG%2BSDX5Mchk2%2BRrfFn=38rXYrFwVxV%2BtG_QkQ>