From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 12 20:50:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386751065676 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9778FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8203 invoked by uid 399); 12 Sep 2012 20:50:08 -0000 Received: from pluto.wwt.com (HELO ?172.29.3.77?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@198.200.139.3) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 12 Sep 2012 20:50:08 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 198.200.139.3 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <5050F587.6010105@dougbarton.us> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:50:15 -1000 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Chisnall References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us> <7778270C-218B-4F23-9941-D6DBED8E054D@theravensnest.org> In-Reply-To: <7778270C-218B-4F23-9941-D6DBED8E054D@theravensnest.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric , current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:50:22 -0000 On 9/12/2012 1:49 AM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 12 Sep 2012, at 10:09, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Also, users who actually are helping with testing clang for ports >> continue to report runtime problems, even with things that build fine. > > I hope that you are encouraging maintainers of ports that don't work as expected with clang to submit bug reports upstream. We can't fix bugs if we aren't made aware of them. I personally am not directly involved in this effort (other than for my own ports), but from what I've seen the classical emphasis on pushing bug reports upstream has been applied in this area as well. hth, Doug