Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:29:06 +0300 From: Markiyan Kushnir <markiyan.kushnir@gmail.com> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <51580FF2.6020808@gmail.com> Resent-Message-ID: <20130331111137.GW12256@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20130331101825.GU8239@home.opsec.eu> References: <513E2DA5.70200@mac.com> <web-12282796@mailback4.g2host.com> <op.wts7cnaeg7njmm@michael-think> <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com> <dd47b0701af3e2b6c92fe70fa0da3fc1.squirrel@webmail.ee.ryerson.ca> <web-11167614@mailback3.g2host.com> <514E7927.2010901@gmail.com> <web-11318704@mailback3.g2host.com> <51580718.1010501@gmail.com> <51580AD1.1070704@gmail.com> <20130331101825.GU8239@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ups, sorry: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9Q-zpUXxqCnRVVMTkk1blVfZzA/edit?usp=sharing Please let me know if you have problems with accessing it. -- Markiyan On 31.03.2013 13:18, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I also measured svnup basic process resource usage, attaching a complete >> plot (measurements were taken each 2 seconds based on ps(1) and >> procstat(1)). Hopefully it will help you as well. > > The attachment did not make it to the list. Can you put it up somewhere ? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51580FF2.6020808>