Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:41:11 -0800 From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: darklogik@pittgoth.com Cc: bmah@acm.org, Alexey Zelkin <phantom@ark.cris.net>, Valentino Vaschetto <logo@freebsd.org>, Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>, Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org>, doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: <port> replacement Message-ID: <200202141841.g1EIfBH22222@bmah.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <3C6BECC5.2000703@pittgoth.com> References: <20020213230809.I92878@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0202131916220.9649-100000@wrath.forked.net> <20020214124806.A7765@ark.cris.net> <200202141639.g1EGdih21528@bmah.dyndns.org> <3C6BECC5.2000703@pittgoth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > If memory serves me right, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > > --SNIP-- > > > > Just what we need...another 6000 entities. :-p > > > oh nooooo..... > > > > > > (find and grep are more expensive than make lint?!?) > > > > Before we bikeshed this whole thing to death, can we at least get rid > > of the <port> tag first, as there's essentially no argument on this > > point? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bruce. > > > > > I recommended that a little awhile ago, and i'll agree on it now. Get > rid of the port tag so that we can begin work on the conversion. After > we dump the port tag, many parts of the documentation will need a sweep > through for the replacement. Was this done before, like a large > replacement of a tag, where perhaps an awk script was used in the > processing? In either case, lets first dump the <port> then work on the > new stuff ;) Well...the patches that dd posted along with his origional message did just that... Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202141841.g1EIfBH22222>