From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  2 01:51:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D72C16A41F;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2005 01:51:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from craig@tobuj.gank.org)
Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8DC43D69;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2005 01:51:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from craig@tobuj.gank.org)
Received: by ion.gank.org (mail, from userid 1001)
	id 6641F2D405; Thu,  1 Dec 2005 19:51:51 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:51:49 -0600
From: Craig Boston <craig@tobuj.gank.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org,
	imp@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20051202015149.GB15424@nowhere>
Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston <craig@tobuj.gank.org>,
	John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org,
	imp@freebsd.org
References: <20051130020734.GA6577@nowhere>
	<200511301035.14284.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20051130172303.GA57453@nowhere>
	<200512011342.19417.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20051202013146.GA15424@nowhere>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051202013146.GA15424@nowhere>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Weird PCI interrupt delivery problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:51:52 -0000

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:31:46PM -0600, Craig Boston wrote:
> If I'm reading the code correctly, it appears that we call _PIC and set
> the interrupt model to APIC, *if an MADT table exists*, regardless if
> we're actually using the I/O APIC or not.  This is what initially had me
> thinking ACPI/PIC wasn't supported at all.

No, scratch that, the enumerator never gets called unless a local apic
device attaches.  The code is correct.  Bizarre, I wonder why the
tunable to override LNK[A-H] wasn't working before.

Craig