From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 17:56:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37446106566B for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27A78FC17 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B074413DF5F; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:56:22 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:56:19 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1982630028.20110112205619@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Pyun YongHyeon In-Reply-To: <20110112173242.GA12920@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111200007.GC6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <149076940.20110112003110@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111224526.GD6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <751614742.20110112120303@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110112173242.GA12920@michelle.cdnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:56:24 -0000 Hello, Pyun. You wrote 12 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 20:32:42: >> > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex >> > media option in your manual configuration. >> What do you mean by this? Without this media options it will be >> 100Mbit half-duplex when switch port want 100Mbit full-duplex. With > Because you have to rely on parallel detection the end result would > be half-duplex. So switch port could be configured to > 100Mbps/half-duplex and you can still use auto-negotiation. This What if I CAN NOT configure switch port? It is 100Mbps/full-duplex/no-autonegotiation and it is not under my control! --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov