From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 16:30:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D68716A4CE for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:30:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2032A43D62 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:30:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7PGUV9q078361 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:30:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7PGUVsm078360; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:30:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:30:31 GMT Message-Id: <200408251630.i7PGUVsm078360@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: dada@sbox.tugraz.at Subject: Re: bin/70929: mpool(3): ignored function argument documented to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dada@sbox.tugraz.at List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:30:37 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/70929; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dada@sbox.tugraz.at To: Peter Pentchev Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/70929: mpool(3): ignored function argument documented to work Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:21:08 +0200 Zitat von Peter Pentchev : > The patch looks okay. I have just one concern: I'm not exactly sure > on the status of src/lib/libc/db/ - is it treated as contributed code, > or is it 'ours' to do with as we wish? I am not a committer, so my answer is not authoritative. However the Berkeley DB 1.85 code has the BSD license and is afaik part of all the *BSD core systems. Later version from Sleepycat (Major >= 2) have a somewhat more restrictive license and are under /usr/ports/databases/db[2-4]*. In short: Matching the docs to the reality (as it stands for 8+ years) should not be a problem.