Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:15:30 -0300
From:      Jean Milanez Melo <jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
To:        Richard Barrett <r.barrett@openinfo.co.uk>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org, Tom Simes <simestd@netexpress.com>, jmelo@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Patches for Mailman 2.1.12?
Message-ID:  <4A55ED72.1030808@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <105A38EF-11EE-44C8-B585-23FCCFAAB9BF@openinfo.co.uk>
References:  <20090708090424.3b1a4eaa.simestd@netexpress.com> <105A38EF-11EE-44C8-B585-23FCCFAAB9BF@openinfo.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Barrett wrote:
> I'll try and find time to produce updated patches for 2.1.12 in the next 
> couple of days.
> 
> On 8 Jul 2009, at 18:04, Tom Simes wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hello Richard,
>>
>> The FreeBSD Mailman port relies on your patches 444879 and 444884 to
>> build and I cannot reach the port maintainter currently.  For better or
>> worse, the port has the patch filenames keyed to the current Mailman
>> version, like so:
>>
>> PATCH_SITES+=   http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/444879/:patch1 \
>>                 http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/444884/:patch2
>> PATCHFILES+=    indexing-${DISTVERSION}-0.1.patch.gz:patch1 \
>>                 htdig-${DISTVERSION}-0.1.patch.gz:patch2
>>
>> So since May the Mailman port has been failing because it cannot
>> retrieve these two files (which don't exist):
>>
>> http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/444879/indexing-2.1.12-0.1.patch.gz
>> http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/444884/htdig-2.1.12-0.1.patch.gz
>>
>> Your web server logs should confirm this in spades.
>>
>> Would it be possible for you to update these two patches against Mailman
>> 2.1.12?  Thank you for continuing to bump these along even though you
>> started out maintaining them for your personal use only!
>>
>> FreeBSD ports team,
>>
>> Mail to the port maintainer (jmelo@FreeBSD.org) is getting a 550 off the
>> address it's currently forwarded to.  The portupgrade behaviour in this
>> case is nasty because for some reason the old mailman install is being
>> nuked and not properly restored when the build fails.  I patched the
>> port Makefile and distinfo to build Mailman 2.1.11 with the appropriate
>> 444879 & 444884 patches and my Mailman install is back in business, but
>> others might not be able to help themselves.  I'll be glad to supply the
>> patches if it would help, although they don't get folks any closer to
>> Mailman 2.1.12.
>>
>> -- 
>> Tom
>>
>> ======================================================================
>>    "Z-80 system stack overflow.  Shut 'er down Scotty, the system's
>>          sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
>>
>> Tom Simes                                       simestd@netexpress.com
>> ======================================================================
> 

Hello,

I'm aware, i'll update the port in next few days.

Thanks.

-- 
Jean



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A55ED72.1030808>