Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:31:11 +0100 From: Andreas Ntaflos <ntaflos.andreas@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gl.h and glu.h not around? Message-ID: <20011207183111.C56626@Deadcell.ANT> In-Reply-To: <20011207082117.A19621@freebsdportal.org>; from jfreeze@freebsdportal.org on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:21:17AM -0500 References: <20011207122820.A56626@Deadcell.ANT> <20011207113639.E9502-100000@cyclops.ehsrealtime.com> <20011207082117.A19621@freebsdportal.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:21:17AM -0500, Jim Freeze wrote: > I have had the same problem. The only problem is that I cannot > get the Mesa3 port to install all the include files and lib files. > I am building applications that need a 'development' install of > Mesa3. The only include files that I can get the port to install are: > > ls -lF /usr/X11R6/include/GL/ > total 30 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 30028 Dec 2 13:44 glut.h > Same here. I backupped /usr/X11R6/include/GL, pkg_deinstalled -F Mesa, portupgraded -RN Mesa and all that gets installed in /usr/X11R6/include/GL is glut.h. Can't be right, can it? regards -- Andreas "ant" Ntaflos ntaflos.andreas@gmx.net Vienna, AUSTRIA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011207183111.C56626>