Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:57:27 -0400
From:      John Lyon <johnllyon@gmail.com>
To:        Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
Cc:        Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Can Ethernet and wi-fi be used concurrently?
Message-ID:  <0E52F8AC-FFEF-4D69-A377-32F0015667E4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3275b02-f1f2-765f-a8f4-f5df3070d655@bluerosetech.com>
References:  <5d0ed525.1c69fb81.d673e.e3dfSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <C146F26C-8D38-4A3D-A8E4-79DAC1EC4F90@gmail.com> <f3275b02-f1f2-765f-a8f4-f5df3070d655@bluerosetech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the clarification.  It was late at night where I am and I missed t=
hat he wants to keep the link active for intranet access even if it fails fo=
r internet access.  That=E2=80=99s what happens when you read at night.

Best,

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 22, 2019, at 10:57 PM, Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> w=
rote:
>=20
>> On 2019-06-22 19:05, John Lyon wrote:
>> You should be able to use the lagg driver to combine the two
>> interfaces in failover mode to achieve your goal.
>=20
> lagg doesn't apply here because Thomas's issue is routing failover.  The m=
aster interface would remain up for intranet access.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E52F8AC-FFEF-4D69-A377-32F0015667E4>