Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:49:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20050319044948.GA69708@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <200503181530.12815.jkim@niksun.com> References: <200503162023.j2GKNWnJ099551@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050317121651.N72560@delplex.bde.org> <20050318201540.GF54333@dragon.NUXI.org> <200503181530.12815.jkim@niksun.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:30:12PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 18 March 2005 03:15 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > > There are both PCI lnc and pcn devices. lnc and pcn can both > > attempt to attach to the same device -- we have code that tries to > > get the two drivers to live piecefully side-by-side. > > Why can't we just remove if_lnc_pci.c? pcn(4) does not support 10Mbit PCI AMD PCnet cards, lnc(4) is still needed for them. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050319044948.GA69708>