From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 20 14:23:25 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4427BA26
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:23:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org
 (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2412B159
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:23:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org
 (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5])
 by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id
 t1KENO0e080815
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:23:24 GMT
 (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org)
Received: (from root@localhost)
 by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1KENOc3080814;
 Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:23:24 GMT (envelope-from root)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:23:24 +0000
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
From: "onwahe-gmail-com (Svatopluk Kraus)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1912: Fix endianness on FDT read in
 ARM GIC
Message-ID: <79256369d17c3e02ed9d477b7c7015a3@localhost.localdomain>
X-Priority: 3
Thread-Topic: D1912: Fix endianness on FDT read in ARM GIC
X-Herald-Rules: none
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-6m5mo2kjikkzyd33ld4n>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-q5lmute3rwskeizvu5gf>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-pns6zgllnr6ze4h7ms3o>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-xvjulcphpj66vffzpxft>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-MLST-stsrni3uozki6w7zubvy>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-ker5chhmevh5hyis4d47-req@FreeBSD.org>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-ker5chhmevh5hyis4d47-req@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: YmE3NzVmMjk2ZDk4MjdlMDE0NzYyNDAwMDVmIFTnQ1w=
X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes
X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: <differential-comment>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:23:25 -0000

onwahe-gmail-com added a comment.

Well, Michal pointed me that it works in currnet. So, the true is that interrupt cells are now decoded in ofw_bus_intr_to_rl(), then again in arm_fdt_map_irq(), and then again in gic_decode_fdt(). So I was wrong. However, doing cpu_to_fdt32() three times on same data is not good too.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1912

To: zbb, imp, andrew
Cc: onwahe-gmail-com, freebsd-arm