From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 28 15:23:30 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2427316A403
	for <FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hannes.hauswedell@gmail.com)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD9944AA2
	for <FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:23:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hannes.hauswedell@gmail.com)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c29so1225335nfb
	for <FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
	b=UwBJfhyhPcCtvmlPmcKNoSAYZUqguv3nYSYjZBTAOjoXlHF7SUTw91JfPJLLskvgw5+auTPWrxd4YNTHTsxG+GAGVVipvZbz6/DeBE4aazlBpIlYgayLuekCn5RzAwFCr9hTPtfTYJHr4WH6A+8/ZvjskBae4JjJIHNh/EzHlUU=
Received: by 10.49.51.8 with SMTP id d8mr799682nfk;
	Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.2.80? ( [85.220.132.38])
	by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p45sm888353nfa.2006.06.28.08.23.26;
	Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hannes Hauswedell <hannes.hauswedell@gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:44:59 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <449CEB97.5020903@gmx.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0606252215240.6301@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0606252215240.6301@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200606281544.59900.hannes.hauswedell@gmail.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: latest wine-kthread broken?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:23:30 -0000

> This may well be.  However, GNU/Linux systems using the pthread variant,
> there is little hope anyone is ever going to fix the kthread variant.  I
> have included the kthread variant as an added benefit, but all development
> and bug fixing really should go into the pthread variant.
>
> You did not mention whether this works for your applications, but I
> assume it does not?
>
> Gerald

just read this and wanted to say:
the pthread binary of wine (the one without suffix) cannot execute a single 
game that i have (whereas there are some that DO run in kthreads mode)...
so whats actually wrong?
i thought POSIX compliance (e.g. threading ) actually means that if something 
works on platform a than it works an platform b too!?
why isnt this the case, is it wines fault or is freebsd's pthread 
implementation not good?

thanks