Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:29:06 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Subject: Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds Message-ID: <28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:04:40 -0400." <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org>, "Andrew R. Reiter" writes : > >I apologize for top posting, but I lost the email that I think my >point/question pertains to. > >Part of this seems to be for compatibility / merging from drivers of other >OSes, no? If I am wrong, ignore me :-). If this is the case, would it be >better to create some common other area for things of this nature so that >it suffices to allow builds, but does not infect other areas of our own >code base? That's what I proposed too: #include <sys/netbsd_compat.h> -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28872.1151526546>