From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr 14 06:01:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA09799
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA09792
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id GAA04019; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Bielicki <Michael.Bielicki@linkdesign.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How is the stability of >SMP ??? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 1997 13:24:31 +0300."
             <19970414132431.17367@linkdesign.com> 
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:01:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4016.861022882@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Has anybody experience with the SMP kernel and how stable is it ???

Well...

> I want to recommend it to a customer for running a heavily packed national ro
uter in eastern europe. So it has to be at least as stable as a CISCO 7200 :)))

Nowhere near that stable.  Don't recommend it. :-)

					Jordan