Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:20:33 +0000 From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@qxnitro.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and ports Message-ID: <CAC8HS2GT0KZdXXv3VCRx291_E8es5uvmHwpzK==VtEuUK2=9dQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301152053070.78271@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301122210240.11994@wonkity.com> <CAC8HS2FewOpz_SWmwMhz7m2TgW1T7YE%2BjPGPkcSJP-TPjJ9Qng@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301131304290.17568@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301152053070.78271@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 January 2013 03:56, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > A rendered sample of the proposed changes to the freebsd-update section: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/temp/fupd-ports2.html > > The diff: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/temp/fupd-ports2.diff For the 'make kernel' to force not using /etc/make.conf: make kernel __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null I think that's what the variable is called - I don't have a FreeBSD handy to check. I think it looks sane from a quick look, but I don't have time for a more detailed review at the moment. PS. I never had to do the magic with installing an old GENERIC myself before, so I can't verify if it works exactly like documented.. but it sounds plausible... -- Simon L. B. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAC8HS2GT0KZdXXv3VCRx291_E8es5uvmHwpzK==VtEuUK2=9dQ>