Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:43:31 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r277497 - head
Message-ID:  <3F018B96-1D7A-40BA-B592-C7DB4505F807@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DDR7nh9W66hk7RYcj0BDROxc-_xeNsjfPLnUYpntTwaA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201501211904.t0LJ4u3R070278@svn.freebsd.org> <CAPyFy2Dyfuu=7eR3T-EK94%2BAoSAjJPARG6GszXKtqqnE21tzRQ@mail.gmail.com> <1421871614.14601.387.camel@freebsd.org> <CAPyFy2Dh2TDziQY_ANTPZwJSxJ4-em=45Kp8xiKyCccbxocpmA@mail.gmail.com> <1421876960.14601.390.camel@freebsd.org> <CAPyFy2DDR7nh9W66hk7RYcj0BDROxc-_xeNsjfPLnUYpntTwaA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> On 21 January 2015 at 16:49, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 16:45 -0500, Ed Maste wrote:
>>> On 21 January 2015 at 15:20, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>> I don't think
>>>> there's a single addr2line binary I can install that will work with
>>>> every object on the system.
>>>=20
>>> There is, in fact - ELF Tool Chain's addr2line will work regardless =
of
>>> the object's architecture.
>>>=20
>>> However, I'm happy enough to revert this change (and add a comment
>>> about non-build use cases) if you like.
>>=20
>> Do you mean the new one you're working on?  Because that doesn't seem =
to
>> be true of the one installed on my 10-stable system right now.  If it =
is
>> true of the new one, that's a much better solution, and I can get by
>> until it's ready for prime time, I think.
>=20
> Yes, the new one I've been working on. It's now the default in HEAD
> (along with nm, strings, size, etc.).
>=20
> Bringing this to stable/10 would be tricky because it depends on the
> new libdwarf in 11 that's not backwards compatible. For that reason
> perhaps I ought to just leave them in the cross-tools stage, until we
> can assume developers are generally cross building from an 11.x host.

There=E2=80=99s little harm in leaving it in, and some harm in taking it =
out=E2=80=A6 The time to build
this stuff is tiny...

Warner




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F018B96-1D7A-40BA-B592-C7DB4505F807>