From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 27 23:17:59 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA05327 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 23:17:59 -0700 Received: from relay.hp.com (relay.hp.com [15.255.152.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA05318 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 23:17:57 -0700 Received: from hpautobo.aus.hp.com by relay.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA068479073; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 23:17:55 -0700 Message-Id: <199509280617.AA068479073@relay.hp.com> Received: by hpautobo.aus.hp.com (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA121809071; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:17:51 +1000 From: M C Wong Subject: [1.1.5.1] option GATEWAY/IPFORWARDING and sockd To: freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org (freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 95 16:17:50 EST Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi, On 1.1.5.1, I wanted to experimented with a socks (sock) based dual-homed firewall setup. I rebuilt and with a kernel WITHOUT option GATEWAY, and it should set IPFORWARDING to 0 according to the options.doc. However, when I try to telnet out of my default gw via the SLIP interface sl0, I CAN get packets out as is with GATEWAY option enabled. Can someone tell me what's happening ? Basically, I want to turn my existing 1.1.5.1 gateway box into a socks-based dual-home firewall box, and I though to be able to do that we must FIRST disable IPFORWARDING. It didn't work for me ... Can someone help please ? Thanks in advance. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i iQCVAwUBMGo+BkmThh0X7Um5AQHM/gP9GGJHFPBhGI6AOO5XZRImRSArorp90BO+ BdYtDuooy3zBBdeynCOl3z59IJI0LfyEizbHckUnuPWxJFmGdPhMtPqgNpKCF/r4 IE6msVlBnG7QgFvp+SVBzSBvXuSbsh2aQeT95mnqbbwOInHnLZy2COyMPbrvslv3 tTfS5WZ2rHk= =m27p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----