From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 14 23:04:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984A7CDFDA5 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7AF41B1C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 55444 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2017 22:58:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@93.104.86.174) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 14 Feb 2017 22:58:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Expulsion of John Marino - reasons and impact? From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27) In-Reply-To: <336aca05-3a85-5881-4c51-ea58d1d203a2@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:58:08 +0100 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3FC190C8-2F60-4215-8BFB-A0C79FE04F17@freebsd.org> References: <336aca05-3a85-5881-4c51-ea58d1d203a2@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:04:53 -0000 > On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote: >=20 >> On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D433827 >=20 > I think that commit message combined with > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html is enough. The commit message basically says that he misbehaved once too often and the C= oC defines what "misbehave" might mean. Not over the top transparent/detaile= d to be honest. >=20 >>=20 >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D433856 >=20 > This commit may have been an error and is being discussed. That seems quite draconian and - if it isn't reversed - needs a good explana= tion. -m >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Regards, > Bryan Drewery >=20