Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:08:13 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: localpkg script changes Message-ID: <19240580-D586-11D8-A6C6-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040713140354.GA1695@rogue.acs-et.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Makonnen wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was looking at integrating ports rc.d scripts a bit better, and the > following is > what I came up with. I would appreciate reviews, tests, etc.. [...] > Ports related rc.d cleanups: > [...] > o The rc.d ports scripts should now behave more like base system > scripts. > Scripts ending in .sh will be sourced into the current shell, while > the > rest will be executed in a subshell. Previously, all ports scripts, > regardless of the .sh suffix, were executed in a subshell. You can't do this, since it might break too many ports. See PR 56736 for an alternate approach. Follow-up to ports@, where this discussion belongs to. See <http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040713140354.GA1695@rogue.acs- et.com> for the original message. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19240580-D586-11D8-A6C6-00039312D914>