Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:24:04 +0930
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Timothy Luoma <freebsd@tntluoma.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCO Group
Message-ID:  <20030921005404.GR16686@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <oprvthelwenva4ua@smtpx.operamail.com>
References:  <000001c37f81$94517160$6501a8c0@athlon> <20030920210753.GA38330@rot13.obsecurity.org> <oprvthelwenva4ua@smtpx.operamail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--AsKt9WDFSpw8OJmf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday, 20 September 2003 at 17:16:59 -0400, Timothy Luoma wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:07:53 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:15:01AM -0400, Ryck wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I've heard that SCO Group has an issue with Linux and is planning to sue
>>> everyone who uses Linux because of the claim that it is using their
>>> code.
>>> Does Free BSD have anything to worry about regarding SCO Group and would
>>> Free BSD users be harmless from SCO Group's litigation threats?
>>
>> Not likely.  See the mailing list archives for further discussion.
>
> I tried to find some information and had no luck.  I was also looking for
> any conversation as to whether this situation with SCO was related at all
> to the problems BSD had with... was it AT&T? .... some years back.

The short answer: SCO's predecessors sued the BSDs for much the same
issue over ten years ago.  The matter was settled out of court.  If
you believe this view, then the BSDs have nothing more to fear.

On the other hand, the way SCO is handling the current issue suggests
that they have lost their minds.  They have presented no proof for
their claims (well, they produced some BSD code purported to be in
Linux, and claimed that it was System V code; see
http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/code-comparison.html#BPF for more
details).  As a result, there's no reason to believe that they
wouldn't make similar claims about the BSDs.  After all, the code in
that example *is* in FreeBSD.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

--AsKt9WDFSpw8OJmf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD4DBQE/bPasIubykFB6QiMRAjDEAJMFJzii9GOija/Jq4hEnzd2VHlKAJ9+IuTe
UyMqwpcdXMa0EH3kHpWGqQ==
=RFnA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AsKt9WDFSpw8OJmf--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921005404.GR16686>