From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 29 03:55:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0DCD816A4CE; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:55:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2C8C843D54; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:55:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net)
Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=ganbold.micom.mng.net)
	by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD))
	id 1CNNuL-0006Cm-A8; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:58:33 +0800
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20041029115322.02b43510@202.179.0.80>
X-Sender: ganbold@micom.mng.net@202.179.0.80
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:55:29 +0900
To: obrien@freebsd.org
From: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041029033416.GC13963@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20041029101540.02b28eb0@202.179.0.80>
 <20041029033416.GC13963@dragon.nuxi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
cc: scottl@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 problem on Dual AMD64 2.2GHz with 8GB RAM
  continues
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:55:42 -0000

At 12:34 PM 10/29/2004, you wrote:
> > With 4GB RAM I compiled kernel without ATA support and tried new kernel
> > with 8GB RAM.
>
>You definately don't want to use ATA, so it is good you compiled it out.
>It is felt by several of us that there is a problem with ATA in >4GB
>systems right now.
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong -- Scott Long verified that the driver for the
>IBM RAID controller you are using is 64-bit clean and has no known issues
>on >4GB systems?

Scott didn't tell me. So I thought it is clean. Maybe now he will confirm it.
I'm cc-ing to him.

Ganbold

> > I checked memory with memtest. No errors, passed everything.
>
>That is a good sign. :-)
>
>--
>-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
>
>
>
>__________ NOD32 1.910 (20041028) Information __________
>
>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>http://www.nod32.com