Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 May 2000 19:51:40 +0100
From:      Mark Ovens <mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org>
To:        Gary Roberts <garyr@wcs.uq.edu.au>
Cc:        chad@DCFinc.com, emulation@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rpm and WordPerfect Office 2000
Message-ID:  <20000516195140.I233@parish>
In-Reply-To: <200005160032.KAA09256@amor.wcs.uq.edu.au>; from garyr@amor.wcs.uq.edu.au on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:32:49AM %2B1000
References:  <200005152346.QAA11498@freeway.dcfinc.com> <200005160032.KAA09256@amor.wcs.uq.edu.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:32:49AM +1000, Gary Roberts wrote:
> Chad R. Larson writes :-
> 
> > As I recall, David Gilbert wrote:
> > > I must say that I'm dissapointed that I can't run it.
> > 
> > This is older hat, but I've had WordPerfect 8 running on a
> > 2.2.8-STABLE system under Linux emulation since Dec, 1998.
> > 
> > Has anyone tried to evaluate pros and cons of the various office
> > suites?
> > 
> > 1)  Applixware - native
> > 2)  StarOffice - linux
> > 3)  WordPerfect - linux
> > 4)  anything - Wine
> > 5)  ???
> 
> I notice that people on this thread have been cc'ing to `emulators' and
> `stable'.  There doesn't seem to be an emulators list - it is `emulation'
> or `freebsd-emulation' according to Majordomo.  This thread probably
> belongs on emulation so the folks there have been missing it so far.
> 
> To answer Chad's question from my perspective, to capture more of the
> desktop rather than server market, FreeBSD needs a workable `office'
> solution.  I was hoping staroffice might be that.  I have had my secretary
> evaluating it with a view to weaning her off W98/Office97.  Here is a
> summary of results.
> 
> So as not to create too much of an initial shock, we installed the W98
> version of staroffice about 4-6 months ago and tried to use it as much
> as possible.  She reported that the suite was pretty much capable of all
> the things she needed and was fairly easy to get used to, BUT:-
> 
> 1.  It was slow, noticeably slower than she was used to.
> 2.  It caused W98 to crash more frequently when she was trying to `push'.
> 3.  She wasn't able to produce documents that our clients could open
>     correctly under Office97.  Since we send a lot of documents as email
>     attachments, this became the killer and so we haven't moved to
>     `phase 2' which was to install it under a decent OS which should have
>     cured the crashes.
> 
> At the moment I've basically given up - she uses W98 and I use FreeBSD.
> I would be very interested in other peoples experiences.  Perhaps
> `emulation' might be the better forum to do this.
> 

I try to use it at work (under NT) but it can't handle "forms" in Word
docs properly, which is a problem. OTOH, it does a better job of
exporting Expel spreadsheets to HTML than Expel 97 does :)

> Cheers,
> -- 
> Gary Roberts            (garyr@wcs.uq.edu.au)
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
        ...and on the eighth day God created UNIX
________________________________________________________________
      FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org
      My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/
mailto:mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org             http://www.radan.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000516195140.I233>