From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 18:06:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2F3229A9D for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Djsg3lhnz3Kkr for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:06:13 -0700 References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Djsg3lhnz3Kkr X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.07)[ip: (-0.26), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.00), asn: 209(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 18:06:17 -0000 On 06 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > I think UPDATING 20200101 should help you. Nope, that doesn=E2=80=99t help me. I updated openssl in January, and as = I said it has been recompiled several times (well, at least six) since = then as I have updated ports. This behavior of confusing the two forms = =E2=80=9Copenssl-1.1.1d,1=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Copenssl111-1.1.1f=E2=80=9D= is new. > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:41:19PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> When trying to port upgrade mariadb it reinstalled openssl (just = about everything for the last month has reinstalled openssl) >>=20 >> I get this after a successful build >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for openssl-1.1.1d,1 >> Installing openssl-1.1.1d,1... >> pkg-static: openssl-1.1.1d,1 conflicts with openssl111-1.1.1d >>=20 >> There is /usr/ports/security/openssl >>=20 >> So why are there two different formats on the port name and how do I = fix this. --=20 It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought...should be = literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words.