From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 4 12:01:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA00438 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 12:01:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA00420; Mon, 4 May 1998 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA00453; Mon, 4 May 1998 14:01:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199805041901.OAA00453@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs NetBSD In-Reply-To: <354E0FD0.89BC1B47@ibm.net> from Don Wilde at "May 4, 98 11:58:24 am" To: dwilde1@ibm.net Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 14:01:03 -0500 (EST) Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, brett@lariat.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > John - > Would you clear something up for me? There's an article on ~andreas > link page from ncworldmag.com that says NCI OS is based on NetBSD. Is he > out of date or have you all shifted back to that code base or is it all > so blurred as to be irrelevant? If he's wrong, would you correct him? He > seems very FreeBSD-positive, I'm sure he would update it. > FreeBSD and NetBSD are both used and redistributed at NCI. NetBSD is the client OS (for portability), and FreeBSD is the server OS (for scalability and performance.) John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message