From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 21:28:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718E416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao03.cox.net (lakermmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0170443D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.71.51]) by lakermmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040711212803.ZLF3786.lakermmtao03.cox.net@dolphin.local.net> for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:28:03 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6BLS237017248 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:28:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@dolphin.local.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6BLS2fJ017243 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:28:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:28:02 -0500 From: Conrad Sabatier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040711212802.GA5473@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Formatting anomaly in sys...NOTES/LINT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:04 -0000 Why is it that the field separator in "device" lines differs from that in "options" lines in NOTES/LINT? I'm referring to the use of "device\t\t" and "options \t". Don't mean to be a hair-splitter, but why is this? Seems it would be better to keep a consistent format throughout. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"