From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 14:59:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD06106564A; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-190.zrh-01.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:41e0:ff00:bd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0206C8FC1C; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from wiggles.bluenet.ch (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3/critical-1.0) with SMTP id n2UExKDm078598; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:59:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:59:20 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Max Brazhnikov Message-Id: <20090330165920.0bc7dcaf.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200903271643.21950.makc@freebsd.org> References: <200903270953.n2R9racu052536@repoman.freebsd.org> <200903271643.21950.makc@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/deb2targz Makefile ports/archivers/ecm Makefile ports/archivers/gzrecover Makefile ports/archivers/mar Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd Makefile ports/archivers/tardy Makefile ports/archivers/unlzx Makefile ports/archivers/unmass ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:23 -0000 > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:53:36 +0000 (UTC), Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Mark MAKE_JOBS_SAFE > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.6 +1 -0 ports/archivers/deb2targz/Makefile > > Is there reason for marking ports, which do not require build target > at all? You're right, that doesn't make sense. I am going to remove it from the ports in question. Also a portlint patch has is waiting to be committed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133207 Emanuel