From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 10 07:01:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA497EE for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A560246 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8A71vSd085875 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:01:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193152] mlxen driver problem with MT26448 interface Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:01:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gnoma_86@gbg.bg X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:01:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193152 --- Comment #2 from gnoma --- Hello, What I found out is that even if I ping my own IP, I still got package lost: root@sentinel:~ # ifconfig | grep 10.0. |grep inet inet 10.0.80.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.80.255 root@sentinel:~ # root@sentinel:~ # ping -f 10.0.80.1 PING 10.0.80.1 (10.0.80.1): 56 data bytes .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................^C --- 10.0.80.1 ping statistics --- 838 packets transmitted, 597 packets received, 28.8% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.021/0.028/0.058/0.006 ms root@sentinel:~ # this is really strange. I saw that with PF firewall, it's recommended to use maximum 1GB interface. However: root@sentinel:~ # /etc/rc.d/pf stop Disabling pf. root@sentinel:~ # ping -f 10.0.80.1 PING 10.0.80.1 (10.0.80.1): 56 data bytes ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................^C --- 10.0.80.1 ping statistics --- 832 packets transmitted, 597 packets received, 28.2% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.028/0.041/0.109/0.009 ms root@sentinel:~ # Even without PF I am still losing packages to my own interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.