Date: 06 Oct 2002 23:20:17 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Traffic shaping Message-ID: <1033912218.4051.2.camel@chowder.dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20021006132624.GA27191@rz-ewok.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> References: <200210050655.g956t3Mp091313@lurza.secnetix.de> <006501c26d35$f6904720$1001a8c0@jennie> <20021006132624.GA27191@rz-ewok.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 22:56, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > Limit the maximum usage of your line to about 90% to 95%. This prevents > usage of the queue in your modem. However, this will not work if > queueing on the remote side is the problem (bulk transfers like downloads > come to mind); you are out of luck if the queue on the remote side is too > long. Actually, if you limit incoming TCP it will adapt to the correct speed. I do this at home without hassle (except the latency in games goes up from ~40 to ~100 but it is still acceptable) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033912218.4051.2.camel>