From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Fri Apr 6 19:00:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AD6F9F2CA for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org) Received: from mail-yb0-x232.google.com (mail-yb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3C46FB9B for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org) Received: by mail-yb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k1-v6so744555yba.5 for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 12:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardenedbsd-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cU6bZ0faTKiqdazf9o5QyYz+eW+0DlIva94eFBjHGE8=; b=Ktm1zHHSmcC5nshiiA1xt8wWOSg6Y8jozQ3DhwcNOZ0aSQ0ks9jIFblokxpz0KteON QZYiAjCZj9mDre6ESe5Yz0xzprNcVQ+jI/nPKKHBZAZaOGpRWzSTzKmhgHfdh4MrxTmS nj6bhFQXnwz+fafEZ9tpR1SLQSFuQO5rKiK+zSfi0SNEMG1KoV94qZliZ3Mk3J6e675U xvotddG1qFXAsoR36xroOFVzbKc8KRM7UFiVO6VNlUwW6dh8/S7FybiNZ6y+RY8RTRfk wyQQnSbjuC7vCF/orrwinBQASV8fDJ0rJnAmcXkRYW0ARV6B0JuQjG2I1bUfBkWj0kwV uQgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cU6bZ0faTKiqdazf9o5QyYz+eW+0DlIva94eFBjHGE8=; b=poKWfH/HZmashCRttoVr+GrSi8IQxBl3fs/wNhB17fXVu+gBN7McnUwZOyGTso43Mm Ypc3GXO7vYIBPSkZ61LMv7aLy5XsRl1MRKR4mOLKJru82XKOFhyvrAIWblv3rGPpTqWi G0L9iMgpLrVBClrfapuREwy+sin0TdxHyyULgtmDpXDSvNeOQ4XQLIFx5mzRfyoWB2DY p6jFfXS7met19CpgBkU2E3ueLSa5SUjNaYpBauzXQPyH+iDKcaTFDQae+sdOrlDxEW7J bjRLxLtJEgxGnL2J88WzCu/tsjqLIaz+gHFqftEnfCzD74XEZfbjLW54Uuc1ojeWwAg1 mrTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDO1LrkgSUVaBYW61YdNbZP/i4qJ16Fv4kO0Vr/3v8TkiVUmMwd u44+Qpb4m2OY1fOd6p5wAgyz2QhK/N1EYbJvFolcXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49Uyw9coK/YDsiIp8nqI3lnF9acdlG7VjlTS4PZBTjZHrCKxD8pyXQayFv3fOhwOuozRXwjh7UENj2NLN1sCm0= X-Received: by 2002:a25:5047:: with SMTP id e68-v6mr15655086ybb.165.1523041231480; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a5b:64b:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 12:00:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2526702.9M648BMneK@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <201803311138.w2VBcKHP014025@repo.freebsd.org> <20180331184109.GA23589@lonesome.com> <2526702.9M648BMneK@ralph.baldwin.cx> From: Oliver Pinter Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 21:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... To: John Baldwin Cc: Ed Maste , Antoine Brodin , src-committers , re , svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric , svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 19:30:06 +0000 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 19:00:33 -0000 On 4/6/18, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, April 02, 2018 12:27:47 PM Ed Maste wrote: >> On 31 March 2018 at 14:41, Mark Linimon wrote: >> This is the most important point of this discussion: we do need to >> ensure there's good communication and coordination between teams where >> dependencies like this exist. I'll take the blame here: Dimitry asked >> me about merging the Clang update to stable/11 and I agreed that it >> was reasonable to merge sooner rather than later to have as much lead >> time as possible before the 11.2 process starts. I also assumed that >> outstanding Clang 6 issues in ports were farther along in being >> addressed. >> >> The key lesson from this discussion is that for significant commits >> and merges like this one we should make sure to always have sufficient >> advance notice. > > Is this driven by -mretpoline? Don't think so since it requires LLD as linker. The LLVM 5 which was already part of the 11-stable has the retpoline option. See r331219. >From other side, I like to see a newer compiler sets in the recent releases, because there are lot of performance improvements and other fixes. > That is, would we not be as aggressive > with pushing for clang 6 in 11.2 if it weren't for that? I kind of feel > like we probably wouldn't and would have left it at 5 and let clang 6 be > a FreeBSD 12 thing. Was -mretpoline backported to clang 5 (I thought > there was some talk of providing patches for clang 5)? > > -- > John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ > svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "svn-src-stable-11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >