From owner-freebsd-alpha  Tue Jul 22 14:35:16 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-alpha>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA00208
          for alpha-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 14:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA00194
          for <alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 14:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA00783; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 14:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: gcc port 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jul 1997 13:19:06 PDT."
             <199707222019.NAA15356@kithrup.com> 
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 14:33:36 -0700
Message-ID: <779.869607216@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Okay, have we decided what the execution evnironment for freebsd/alpha
> will be?  (e.g., a.out, coff, elf, stabs, dwarf, ecoff, etc.)

I'm assuming whatever the other *BSDs have chosen - to diverge in such
a small market would be silly.  That would be ELF, yes?

					Jordan