From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 18:13:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB1E106564A for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8A98FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so338147yie.13 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4Yn44oErfzowYDujp9jJYQbheIe22HzJynBXbLiGD+4=; b=tswmGNGfqy+1zFuCoQsCgNd9Z9qpilOU0EjxO0oIZTh4/wnVnfnYoQupqyTMx3QTpq lzAel6DyoGQ5kqmc6qrGRfkeLQhqvtJ5lzLP5UZSoJOJd+M8hdqYKe6ZdAQz6naYHys+ jqDdNDiCIrH+fMTIfJ2BE0MIEaulyZPk/3CQs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=GvfKFEo/QUav3XRkbzbxK6QcyrSL9J0MfmEHnEdmYuK2HW7t8QEH/HvBfnUNWOa+Dz xYeuKH8NiTx9uuR+ZLqHwSDQh4mvDuOdIZOCWQaQ+ff0rIsaZ6UwuRfr6ZXKT2pQ5NeC i4TNpMRuYgSytpyIe+1VLybNAFWtL8RHJPcWU= Received: by 10.90.249.31 with SMTP id w31mr124023agh.169.1294856011925; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:13:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b27sm1110283ana.8.2011.01.12.10.13.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:13:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:12:55 -0800 From: Pyun YongHyeon Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:12:55 -0800 To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: <20110112181255.GC12920@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111200007.GC6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <149076940.20110112003110@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111224526.GD6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <751614742.20110112120303@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110112173242.GA12920@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <1982630028.20110112205619@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1982630028.20110112205619@serebryakov.spb.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:13:33 -0000 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:56:19PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Pyun. > You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 20:32:42: > > > >> > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex > >> > media option in your manual configuration. > >> What do you mean by this? Without this media options it will be > >> 100Mbit half-duplex when switch port want 100Mbit full-duplex. With > > Because you have to rely on parallel detection the end result would > > be half-duplex. So switch port could be configured to > > 100Mbps/half-duplex and you can still use auto-negotiation. This > What if I CAN NOT configure switch port? It is > 100Mbps/full-duplex/no-autonegotiation and it is not under my control! > Of course that kind of workaround would not be available if you have no reachability to the switch. I thought service provider can do that by your request. > -- > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov >