From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 09:01:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D98C16A4CE for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:01:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.atcom.spb.ru (ns.atcom.spb.ru [213.182.169.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B090543D35 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from postfix@sendmail.ru) Received: from karputer (ppp-dialup-16.atcom.spb.ru [213.182.168.16]) by ns.atcom.spb.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E9554BB4E; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:01:27 +0300 (MSK) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web (http://www.drweb.net) Message-ID: <001e01c3c19a$ac1b9900$0202a8c0@karputer> From: "toxa" To: "Norikatsu Shigemura" References: <200312121910.14245.postfix@sendmail.ru><20031212.124333.73362266.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031214011007.3400fe79.nork@ninth-nine.com> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:00:54 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT state of modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:01:34 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norikatsu Shigemura" To: Cc: Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:10 PM Subject: Re: CURRENT state of modules > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:43:33 -0700 (MST) > "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > > In message: <200312121910.14245.postfix@sendmail.ru> > > toxa writes: > > : So my question is loading MANY modules will be as stable (or as unstable) as > > : putting them into kernel as appropriate devices (or options), or I will found > > : some problems? > > My laptop kernel has the following devices in it: > > ata, sc, atkbdc atkbd, psm, pci, pcib, acpi > > and the rest it gets from modules I load at boot time (or later). > > I use nearly these on my laptop. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > 7 6 0xc0741000 27c40 usb.ko > 8 1 0xc0769000 596c ugen.ko > 9 1 0xc076f000 655c umass.ko > /boot/loader.conf.local > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > usb_load="YES" > ugen_load="YES" > umass_load="YES" I see you load usb as module but 'device uhci' or 'device ohci' is still has to be in kernel (i can't see it such modules in /boot/kernel/), isn't it? If I remove 'device usb' from kernel putting it in loader.conf as module, I got usb-related error then compiling kernel, and putting 'device usb' back in the kernel makes buildkernel happy. maybe I do smth wrong? Would you mind to show me your kernconf. Thanks