From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 5 07:12:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA02121 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 07:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.fnet.fr (relay1.fnet.fr [192.134.192.129]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA02115 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 07:12:50 -0800 (PST) From: haury@sagem.fr Received: from sagem.UUCP by relay1.fnet.fr (5.65c8d/92.02.29) via Fnet/EUnet-France id AA27023; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:12:46 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199602051456.PAA00351@sagem.fr> Subject: Re: CTM: evolutions of ctm To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:56:27 +0100 (MET) Cc: haury@sagem.fr, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2001.823530673@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Feb 5, 96 03:31:13 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >Yes, I did that on purpose. Didn't you say that it would be easier to >write make rules if we used ".ctm" instead of "#ctm" ? > Yes, what's easier since you don't need to escape the # on your file so the makefile is a little bit more readable ... and using '#' in filenames can sometimes be a bit tricky under shell ... So, I agree with this modification. -- =Christian Haury (Christian.Haury@sagem.fr) --------------------------------------------------------- | SAGEM Eragny - Avenue du Gros Chene - Eragny BP 51 | | 95612 Cergy Pontoise Cedex - France | | phone : +33 (1) 34 30 53 93 | telex : 607387F | | fax : +33 (1) 34 30 50 28 | teletex : 933-130731770 | ---------------------------------------------------------