Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:13:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Tani Hosokawa <unknown@riverstyx.net> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: lh@aus.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907151211190.10288-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net> In-Reply-To: <000101becef4$966499b0$021d85d1@youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > > > If Apache went to a model as bad as 'one thread per > > request', you'd do > > > better to advise switching to another web server instead. > > > > "went to"? Right now it's a one *process* per request. Have you ever run > > Apache? > > Sure. I run it on many machines, including several that are very heavily > loaded. > > It's one-process-per-request model is atrocious. If they're going to go to > the trouble to fix it, they should actually fix it. Going to > one-thread-per-request is just silly. > > If you're going to make a threaded program, you should do it right. A > half-assed threaded program may even be worse than a well-designed > one-process-per-request program. Again, off in theory. Fact is, the threaded server is faster than the per-process model. And, it's not just going to go away. --- tani hosokawa river styx internet To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9907151211190.10288-100000>