Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:35:59 -0400 From: PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: glabel clarification Message-ID: <4ADC794F.3050505@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <6201873e0910190729v12f66335xe93d0c83a0ee7aee@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ADC6D89.10600@videotron.ca> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBA57086@w2003s01.double-l.local> <4ADC772F.3060303@videotron.ca> <6201873e0910190729v12f66335xe93d0c83a0ee7aee@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca > <mailto:af.gourmet@videotron.ca>> wrote: > > Yes, this is true and that is why I thought that glabel would > work; I am > trying to set up my computers with identical clones that I can update > with changes on the master machine from time to time and thus prevent > data loss in case of problems. So I use ad12 as the main system; if it > were to crash I would then boot from ad6 which is identical. But the > /etc/fstab is identical in both machines. So if I boot from ad6, I > will > get booted from ad12 ... so that doesn't work. It looks like we > need an > unique identifier for each disk. > > > Why not use gmirror? > > > -- > Adam Vande More because I am not using RAID. :-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ADC794F.3050505>