From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 18 15:44:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA17603 for current-outgoing; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wgrobez1.remote.louisville.edu (root@wgrobez1.remote.louisville.edu [136.165.243.183]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA17588 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 15:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wangel@localhost) by wgrobez1.remote.louisville.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA00301; Sun, 18 Aug 1996 18:43:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 18:43:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Gary Roberts To: Terry Lambert cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ip Masq. In-Reply-To: <199608182229.PAA08055@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 18 Aug 1996, Terry Lambert wrote: > > No one is going to be able to get to the win95 machine, no matter what, > if you proxy connections as locally originating on the BSD machine (ie: > you use a transparnet proxy service of any kind). Yah, I don't care about that. I don't want anyone on my win95 machine. > > No one is going to be able to get the BSD machine unless your provider > establishes a static route for you on your PPP connection. This is > something you will need to talk to your provider about doing automatically > for PPP hosts. The route must be transient, by its nature, since a PPP > connection is interruptible. I have a static route, just one IP ... My provider will not give me another ip for my win95 machine, so I'm stuck with one ip :( > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. > Gary Roberts System Admin. -- Altered Reality. http://136.165.243.183 -- Main User Pages