Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:05:29 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml.diespammer@netfence.it> To: spe@phear.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Problems with latest freevrrpd. Message-ID: <42B1E999.1050800@netfence.it>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. I have two FreeBSD 4.11 boxes which have been using freevrrpd for a long time. Today I upgraded from 0.8.7 to 0.9.3 and since then I started having some problems. Specifically I started to see this messages on both boxes: freevrrpd[822]: ip ttl of vrrp packet isn't set to 255. Packet is discar ded ! Strangest thing is that this boxes are both dual-homed, and one side (fxp1 below) was working correctly, the other not (fxp0 below), meaning that both boxed grabbed all configured address (yes, both master and backup). I googled around and found out that someone was having the same problem, but no solution was provided. Since I was in a hurry, I grabbed the sources, commented this test out in vrrp_misc_check_vrrp_packet, and recompiled. Since then everything seems to work correctly, but I didn't have the chance to test failover yet (!!!). Comments and/or suggestions? Furthermore, I'm frequently seeing the following messages: freevrrpd[2188]: all errors are cleared on interface fxp1 freevrrpd[2188]: all errors are cleared on interface fxp0 Is this normal? Or something worth looking at? Here is my conf: [VRID] serverid = 1 interface = fxp1 priority = 255 addr = 192.168.0.4/32 password = xxxxx [VRID] serverid = 2 interface = fxp1 priority = 254 addr = 192.168.0.5/32 password = xxxxx vridsdep=4 [VRID] serverid=3 interface=fxp0 priority=255 addr=192.168.101.5/32 password=xxxxx [VRID] serverid=4 interface=fxp0 priority=254 addr=192.168.101.6/32 password=xxxxx vridsdep=1 The one on the other box is just specular, only one interface is fxp0, the other xl0. P.S. Please remove .diesmapper to reply. Sorry I have to do this :(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42B1E999.1050800>