From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 21:05:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9302B16A41F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (host29-15.pool8174.interbusiness.it [81.74.15.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F4043D48 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-212-5.41-151.net24.it [151.41.5.212]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5GLDRH5089439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:13:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.ventu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5GL5EYv087942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:05:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <42B1E999.1050800@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:05:29 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: spe@phear.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.2.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: Subject: Problems with latest freevrrpd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:50 -0000 Hello. I have two FreeBSD 4.11 boxes which have been using freevrrpd for a long time. Today I upgraded from 0.8.7 to 0.9.3 and since then I started having some problems. Specifically I started to see this messages on both boxes: freevrrpd[822]: ip ttl of vrrp packet isn't set to 255. Packet is discar ded ! Strangest thing is that this boxes are both dual-homed, and one side (fxp1 below) was working correctly, the other not (fxp0 below), meaning that both boxed grabbed all configured address (yes, both master and backup). I googled around and found out that someone was having the same problem, but no solution was provided. Since I was in a hurry, I grabbed the sources, commented this test out in vrrp_misc_check_vrrp_packet, and recompiled. Since then everything seems to work correctly, but I didn't have the chance to test failover yet (!!!). Comments and/or suggestions? Furthermore, I'm frequently seeing the following messages: freevrrpd[2188]: all errors are cleared on interface fxp1 freevrrpd[2188]: all errors are cleared on interface fxp0 Is this normal? Or something worth looking at? Here is my conf: [VRID] serverid = 1 interface = fxp1 priority = 255 addr = 192.168.0.4/32 password = xxxxx [VRID] serverid = 2 interface = fxp1 priority = 254 addr = 192.168.0.5/32 password = xxxxx vridsdep=4 [VRID] serverid=3 interface=fxp0 priority=255 addr=192.168.101.5/32 password=xxxxx [VRID] serverid=4 interface=fxp0 priority=254 addr=192.168.101.6/32 password=xxxxx vridsdep=1 The one on the other box is just specular, only one interface is fxp0, the other xl0. P.S. Please remove .diesmapper to reply. Sorry I have to do this :(