Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:04:21 +0100 From: Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: why "-R" und not "-r"? Message-ID: <l6c764-lu3.ln1@news.hansenet.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi There, one question about this antry in UPDATING: ,---- | 20061221: | AFFECTS: users of security/gnupg | AUTHOR: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org | | The security/gnupg port was upgraded to 2.0.1 (with securty fix) | and good-old gnupg-1.4.6 was repocopied to security/gnupg1. | | Both of security/gnupg (2.x) and security/gnupg1 (1.4.x) are | designed not to conflict with each other. So you can use | security/gnupg1 for gpg(1), and use security/gnupg for gpg2(1) | commands. | | All directly dependents are $PORTREVISION bumped, so portupgrade -R | gnupg will works fine. After portupgrade, you will have both of | gnupg-2.0.1 and gnupg-1.4.6. `---- Why "portupgrade -R gnup"? Isn't it "portupgrade -r gnup"? Heino
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l6c764-lu3.ln1>