From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 26 11:04:53 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB2316A40F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:04:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B22A13C48D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:04:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GzA6t-0006Dg-8p
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:04:44 +0100
Received: from e177218019.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.177.218.19])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:04:43 +0100
Received: from rotkap by e177218019.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:04:43 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:04:21 +0100
Organization: yes
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <l6c764-lu3.ln1@news.hansenet.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e177218019.adsl.alicedsl.de
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix)
X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW;
	ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R;
	w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O<ei}J0Al]3)bYC0sX=\5Uhc4T"RML'B}1DD*<ilY<p'63eq*36`tQ6c&cZ!,#l9s;
	m$dW
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: why "-R" und not "-r"?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:04:53 -0000

Hi There,

one question about this antry in UPDATING:

,----
| 20061221:
|    AFFECTS: users of security/gnupg
|    AUTHOR: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org
| 
|    The security/gnupg port was upgraded to 2.0.1 (with securty fix)
|    and good-old gnupg-1.4.6 was repocopied to security/gnupg1.
| 
|    Both of security/gnupg (2.x) and security/gnupg1 (1.4.x) are
|    designed not to conflict with each other.  So you can use
|    security/gnupg1 for gpg(1), and use security/gnupg for gpg2(1)
|    commands.
| 
|    All directly dependents are $PORTREVISION bumped, so portupgrade -R
|    gnupg will works fine.  After portupgrade, you will have both of
|    gnupg-2.0.1 and gnupg-1.4.6.
`----


Why "portupgrade -R gnup"? Isn't it "portupgrade -r gnup"? 

Heino