Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:06:18 +0100
From:      "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>
To:        "Alexey Popov" <lol@chistydom.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <b41c75520711191006v581d123bs72e705c77b928853@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>
References:  <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 19, 2007 2:32 PM, Alexey Popov <lol@chistydom.ru> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a large pool of web backends (Apache + mod_php5) with
> 2 x Xeon 3.2GHz processors and 2 x Xeon 5120 dual-core processors. The
> workload is mostly CPU-bound. I'm using 6-STABLE-amd64 and also tried
> 7-STABLE.
>
> Now I'm trying to use new hardware with 2 x Xeon 5320 (quad-core), but
> it can not work under the same load as dual-core. It shows up to 80%
> system CPU load in top:
>
> last pid:  3850;  load averages: 22.51, 19.75, 12.18

Very high load. Could it be the raid-controller? I had a db-server
with horibble performance due to a cheap raid-controller. Moving to a
ciss-controller (DL380 G5) solved all my issues. My load decreased 100
fold.

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520711191006v581d123bs72e705c77b928853>