Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:24:38 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r383466 - in head/x11-toolkits/wxgtk30: . files Message-ID: <20150410182438.GA14746@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55281352.6060904@marino.st> References: <201504061849.t36InrtY095320@svn.freebsd.org> <20150410174533.GB77333@hades.panopticon> <55281352.6060904@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 08:15:46PM +0200, John Marino wrote: > On 4/10/2015 19:45, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > * John Marino (marino@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > > >> x11-toolkits/wxgtk30: Support c++11 over c++0x, plus DragonFly > >> > >> The wxgtk30 port will use TR1 headers if the capability is detected. > >> These TR1 functions were experimental and not included in the same form > >> in the final c++11 standard. This patch forcibly disabled TR1 support, > >> which requires the explicit setting of -std=c++11 in CXXFLAGS> > >> > >> A private "exp-run" was performed, all 62 ports dependent on wxgtk2 > >> successfully built before and after after the patch was applied on two > >> separate runs (FreeBSD 10 amd64 jail). > > > > You should test on all supported FreeBSD branches and all tier1 > > architectures. You've broken (all?) dependent ports on 8.x and 9.x. > > I had just finished a bulk build on DragonFly that uses gcc 4.7 and I > see 15 failures through a rough grep log. I think it's caused by older > clang/gcc using an older c++ std, while the latest versions are on > -std=c++11. Adding this cxxflag will likely fix most of them (success > with wxguitar, sooperlooper failed elsewhere) On the other hand, many of these dependent ports actually do not require dreaded c++11 (or c++0x) support. It would be very unfortunate to force it on all of them just because wxgtk30 guys do not know how to develop software [1]. Can we bring wxgtk30 back to sanity, please? ./danfe [1] Forcing c++11 on a popular GUI toolkit in 2015 is bad beyond evil.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150410182438.GA14746>