Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      21 Jan 2002 16:45:41 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc:        markm@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: pam_opie(8) prompt
Message-ID:  <xzpk7ubwvve.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20020121152134.GA37234@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <xzpelkjyeh3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121142901.GA36594@nagual.pp.ru> <20020121150716.GA36954@nagual.pp.ru> <xzp1ygjybwt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121152134.GA37234@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes:
> Yes, I see it too now. It is definitely some bug here. When I say "in 
> login" I mean I test it through:

The bug is quite simply that pam_opie(8) never sets the AUTHTOK item,
so pam_unix(8) doesn't know that the user already entered a password.

I believe pam_get_pass() should set PAM_AUTHTOK.  Any objections?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk7ubwvve.fsf>