From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 19:23:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chromium@FreebSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF119A6 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD116D24 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKuwM-0004Mk-5I for freebsd-chromium@FreebSD.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:23:46 +0100 Received: from a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.154.115.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:23:46 +0100 Received: from rakuco by a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:23:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-chromium@FreebSD.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: Native build of chromium/webrtc source requires full path in /usr/local Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:23:32 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <867g89n4y3.fsf@orwell.Elisa> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PErv5ZTwQGoCUDOdCt7pnOMPNUU= X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:23:55 -0000 Joe Nosay writes: > I've had to rewrite the paths on h, c, and cc files for the build to > continue. The assumption, and hopefully not a faulty one, is that the port > Makefile can be edited so that any build from the Google Chrome Framework > can be ported to FreeBSD. Fewer files than thought of need to be changed; > and, even on the ChromeOS build, I have noticed that vfs.h references can > be replaced with NFS references- it's basically the same thing, which may > be good if someone is interested in having a ChromeOS Linux compatibility > layer. > > Will the assumption work; and, if so, then what parts will I need to work > on? I couldn't really understand your question. Can you post an example of a change you had to make?